Answer To An Enemy Of Islam part 02

Answer To An Enemy Of Islam part 02Buddy all, is meeting now I will continue the story of the book of lies and slander answer written by an LA-madhhabî Egypt, Rashid Rida, who masquerades as a religious man, the ulama (Islamic scholars) in his book entitled Muhâwarât, where he defend unification (talfîq) from four schools and so on, as we have see a few days ago that we've noticed starting from points 1-6. This is the sequel ;

7– “In many countries, it is seen that the Hanafîs do not perform salât together with the Shâfi’îs. Saying ‘âmin’ loud behind the imâm and moving the finger up when reciting the Tahiyya have been causing enmity.”

The books of all the madhhabs clearly write that a Muslim who belongs to a madhhab can perform salât behind one belonging to another madhhab. The idea that the small differences concerning the ’Ibâdât of the four madhhabs will cause enmity originates from the day-dreams and slanders of the enemies of the madhhabs, that is, the mulhids and zindîqs.

In every part of the world Muslims of the four madhhabs have been performing salât behind one another, for, they all know and love one another as brothers. The great Walî, profound ’âlim Hadrat Mawlânâ Diyâ’ addîn Khâlid al-Baghdadî (d. 1242/1826) was a Shâfi’î. His murshid (guide, ’âlim, ustadh) Hadrat ’Abdullah ad-Dahlawî, who gave him faid (the outpouring that flows from the murshid’s heart to the disciple’s heart which thus attains motion, purity and exaltation) and the khilâfa [(certificate of) authority to instruct others], was a Hanafî.

Hadrat ’Abd al-Qâdir Al-Jîlânî (d. 561/1165) was a Shâfi’î. Seeing that the Hanbalî madhhab was about to be forgotten, he became a Hanbalî in order to protect and strengthen it. Jalâl addîn Muhammad Mahallî (d. 864/1459), writer of the tafsîr book
Al-Jalâlain, was a Shâfi’î; Ahmad ibn Sâwî (d. 1241/1825), who was a Mâlikî, wrote a commentary (sharh) on this tafsîr book and facilitated its spreading far and wide. While interpreting the sixth âyat of Sûrat Fâtir in this commentary, he wrote: “The lâmadhhabîs who live in the Hijaz, in Arabia, claim that they alone are Muslims. They say that the Muslims of Ahl as-Sunna are polytheists, though Ahl as-Sunna are the true Muslims. They are liars. We wish that Allâhu ta’âlâ will annihilate these heretical people.”

Hadrat Ahmad ibn Sâwî’s annotation (hâshiya) on the tafsîr book Al-Baidâwî won a great fame, too. The famous ’âlim al-Baidâwî (d. 685/1286) was a Shâfi’î. His tafsîr is one of the most valuable tafsîr books. Most ’ulamâ’ of the four madhhabs praised it and wrote commentaries on it. For example, the commentary by Shaikhzâda Muhammad Efendî, a Hanafî ’âlim, is famous and very valuable. As all Muslims know, the number of the books written by the ’ulamâ’ of the four madhhabs, in which they express their praise and love for one another, exceed thousands.

8– “Of the Islamic umma, many became profound scholars. Such murshids as Hujjat al-Islâm Imâm al-Ghazâlî and Shaikh al-Islâm Ibn Taimiyya were of these.”

He represents such a lâ-madhhabî person as Ibn Taimiyya, who said that Allâhu ta’âlâ was an object, who disbelieved the fact that non-Muslims would be tormented eternally in Hell, who claimed that it was not necessary to perform an omitted fard salât, and who tried to demolish Islam from within through many other similar corrupt ideas, as an Islamic scholar and murshid, and introduces him as a mujtahid like the great Islamic scholar al-Ghazâlî. Writing these two names together is a misleading invention like putting a piece of black stone by the side of a diamond. The Mâlikî scholar Ahmad ibn Sâwî wrote: “The scholars of Ahl as-Sunna reported that Ibn Taimiyya deviated from the right path himself and also caused many Muslims to
deviate. It is a lie that he had had companionship with the Mâlikî
scholar Imâm Ashhab.”

9– Rashîd Ridâ says: “I wrote that the taqlîd was wrong in the periodical Al-Manâr, which I published in 1315 [1898]. I had taken some of those writings from Imâm ’Allâma Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jawziyya. Gathering them, I published the book Muhâwarât.”

By writing that the taqlîd (following, being a member of, one of the four madhhabs) is wrong, the religion reformer blemishes billions of the Ahl as-Sunna Muslims who have appeared for fourteen hundred years. He means that they will go to Hell. It must be because the lâ-madhhabî, mulhids and zindîqs, that is, religion reformers, themselves know about their own defects that they cannot attack the Ahl as-Sunna openly.

By using false, deceptive, evasive words, they always play behind the curtain. How could it ever be said to be wrong to follow an imâm almadhhab? Allâhu ta’âlâ declares in the sûras an-Nahl and al-Anbiyâ’, “Learn by asking those who know!” and “Adapt yourselves to Ulû ’l-amr (’ulamâ’)!” It is for this reason that it has been wâjib to follow an imâm al-madhhab. By saying that it is wrong to follow him, this lâ-madhhabî heretic means to say, “Follow me, not him!” He tries to make Muslims give up imitating the right way so that they imitate his own wrong way. The lâmadhhabî
are the imitators of error.

There are two kinds of taqlîd. The first one is the non-Muslims’ following their parents and priests and remaining in the state of disbelief. Taqlîd of this kind is certainly wrong (bâtil). The Qur’ân al-kerîm and the Hadîth ash-sherîf prohibit this kind of taqlîd. And it is not enough for a Muslim to say that he is Muslim just by imitating his parents. A person who knows, approves and believes the meanings of the six fundamentals of îmân is a Muslim.

It is obvious that imitating somebody in respect of îmân is wrong. Likewise, it is a wrong imitation to believe the lâ-madhhabî and to dissent from the Ahl as-Sunna. Further, it is incorrect to liken this to the taqlîd in respect of a’mâl (acts or practices). The Qur’ân al-kerîm and the Hadîth ash-sherîf command this second kind of taqlîd. The hadîth, “My umma do not agree on deviation!” shows that all of what the scholars of the right path have written is correct.

Those who are against this are unjust and wrong. By the consensus of millions of the Ahl as-Sunna and thousands of Awliyâ’, who have appeared for thirteen hundred years, it is wâjib for a Muslim who is not a mujtahid to follow a mujtahid whom he believes, trusts and likes so that he can do his actions and ’ibâdât correctly. He who disbelieves this consensus will be disbelieving this Hadîth sherîf.

This consensus also shows that a mujtahid should act in accordance with his own ijtihâd, and he is not permitted to follow another mujtahid. Each Sahâbî (Muslim who saw the Prophet at least once) was a mujtahid. For this reason, they disagreed with one another on some actions. Likewise, Imâm Yûsuf’s not renewing his ablution on a Friday and al-Imâm ash-Shâfi’î’s not raising his hands after bowing during salât as he visited al-Imâm al-a’zam Abû Hanîfa’s grave were in no way the taqlîd of others; they followed their own ijtihâds on these occasions.

Continued ...

Hakikat Kitabevi, Waqf Ikhlas Publications No: 10, Answer to an Enemy of Islam, Muhâwarât, Fourteenth Edition, Fatih-Istanbul (Turkey), p. 16-18, (2000), or http://hakikatkitabevi.com
Share this article :

Post a Comment

 
Come Back to : Home | My Web | My Inbox
Copyright © 2013. READ MORE POST - All Rights Reserved
Proudly powered by Blogger